Research Links

Posted by .

Nine ways 5G and the IoT will harm humans, the environment, and Earth

  • Health – The robust and growing independent science shows harms to our health from microwave radiation
  • Privacy – The invasion of our privacy from the collection and mining of our digital data
  • Cyber Security -The fast growing and devastating cyber security risks
  • Environment – The harms to wildlife, particularly bees, butterflies and other pollinators
  • Energy – The huge energy consumption to produce and power a wireless Internet of Things
  • Brains and Humanity – The effects on our brains and humanity from humans increasingly inhabiting the cyber world
  • E-Waste – The astronomical e-waste that will be generated from connecting virtually every “thing” to the Internet
  • Conflict Minerals – 5G and the IoT will vastly grow our dependence on conflict minerals, which have brought about the death of close to 6 million people
  • Ethics — Ethical issues arising from the IoT. New human rights laws are being being considered; how should humans relate to robots and AI? The blurring of what was once a clear delineation between technology and humans
 

Telecom presents 5G to President Trump: “No need for fiber to homes,” the rep explains. 5G uses fiber to the pole and then goes wirelessly the rest of the way. What he doesn’t mention is that by melding the fiber network (that we paid for) with the wireless infrastructure, they become an unregulated service. Win/win for Telecom. Lose/lose for us.

Forcing a Total, Saturated 5G Future… Without Safety Checks Aug. 19th, 2017 | Truth Stream |

Everything You Need to Know About 5G | Feb. 6th, 2017 | IEEE Spectrum

Interview With The Lifelike Hot Robot Named Sophia (Full) | Oct. 25th, 2017 | CNBC
 

Three Square Market becomes the 1st American company to implant employees with microchips | July 26th, 2017 | ABC News
 

March 2018 Independent journalistic platform WeAreChange.NL explores the dark side of this everything digital infrastructure in a new documentary including: Frans van der Reep, futurist and lecturer Digital World, University In Holland;
 

More In-depth Scientific Research Material:

 

01. https://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1996/fcc96326.pdf
02. http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf
03. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IARC_Group_2B_carcinogens
04. http://www.panna.org/resources/ddt-story
05. http://emfrefugee.blogspot.ca/2016/04/levels-of-man-made-artificial-radio.html
06. http://www.parentsforsafetechnology.org/worldwide-countries-taking-action.html
07. http://www.aekwien.at/media/REFLEX_Vortrag.pdf
08. To preserve the privacy of these people and to in order to make an important point, I had to change their names and circumstances slightly. Every single one of these case studies are based on real stories that were reported by doctors and experts on treating electro hypersensitivity (EHS). To read more examples of people reporting many symptoms from the installation of a smart meter or other excess sources of radiation, see http://www.mainecoalitiontostopsmartmeters.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Exhibit-10-Smart-Meter-Health-Effects-Report-Survey2.pdf
09. Plourde, E., PhD, and Plourde, M., PhD. (2016). EMF Freedom — Solutions for the 21st Century Pollution – 3rd Edition. New Voice Publications. Drs. Plourde have reported that a lot of their patients mistakenly think they suffer from early menopause, when in reality they suffer from EMF radiation sickness.
10. This story is classic. See Building Biologist Oram Miller who reported such results when being interviewed on CBS Local 2 a few years ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WONwXP5lvM
11. https://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/Pages/American-Academy-of-Pediatrics-Announces-New-Recommendations-for-Childrens-Media-Use.aspx
12. https://www.consumerreports.org/cell-phones/what-the-cell-phone-brain-cancer-study-means-for-you/
13. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17482179
14. http://emfsafetynetwork.org/harvard-doctor-warns-against-wi-fi-hazards/
15. http://www.physiology.columbia.edu/MartinBlank.html
16. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nxDOf8Yv94
17. https://emfscientist.org/images/docs/EMF_Scientist_Press_Release_5-1-2015.pdf
18. http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/download/Havas%20-%20spread%20of%20wifi%20and%20risks%202013.pdf
19. Blank, M., PhD. (2015). Overpowered: The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation (EMF) and What You Can Do about It. Seven Stories Press.
20. See http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412014001354, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21799142, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2776019/, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3752730/, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24700791 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27601711
21. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341445/
22. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891061815000599
23. http://www.marioninstitute.org/electromagnetic-load-a-hidden-factor-in-many-illnesses/
24. Research by Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt has shown that candida and mold cultures can start spewing up to 600 times more biotoxins when exposed to EMF radiation. See http://it-takes-time.com/2015/07/10/microbial-growth-and-electromagnetic-radiation/
25. See this report listing several studies on EMFs and their effects on the blood-brain barrier: http://www.emfresearch.com/emfs-blood-brain-barrier/
26. http://www.bioinitiative.org/conclusions/
27. http://electromagnetichealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Havas_HRV_Ramazzini1.pdf
28. http://www.clearlightventures.com/blog/2014/07/emf-reduction-for-autism.html
29. See this interview with Dr. Elizabeth Plourde to hear about the whole story: http://onairwithella.com/067-2/
30. Experiment done by Dr. Magda Havas from the Trent University in Toronto, Canada. Live blood cells in a low-electrosmog environment (A), and after using a cordless phone for 10 min (B). Excerpt of her 2013 paper: http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/download/Havas%20-%20spread%20of%20wifi%20and%20risks%202013.pdf

Top 10 Facts About Cell Phones and Wi-Fi

1. All cell phones and wireless devices emit radiation.

Top 10 Facts about Cell Phone and Wi-Fi

Every wireless device is actually a two-way microwave radio that sends and receives a type of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation called radio frequency radiation RF – EMF. This machine-made radiation is millions of times higher than the natural electromagnetic fields (EMFs) our grandparents were exposed to.

2. Our brains and bodies are penetrated by this radiation.

Top 10 Facts about Cell Phone and Wi-Fi

When we hold a cell phone against our head to talk, the radiation from the phone moves into our brain. Likewise, when we use a wireless laptop, the radiation penetrates into our abdominal region, chest area and brain.

3. Cell phones and wireless devices emit radiation constantly, even when you are not talking or using the phone.

Top 10 Facts about Cell Phone and Wi-Fi

A powered on cell phone is always “checking in” and maintaining a connection to the nearest cell tower by sends intense bursts of radiation several times per second. Likewise, a wireless-enabled laptop, tablet or other device is always “checking in” with the nearby router or a network base. These “check ins” are radiation emissions—happening several times per second, and whether or not a connection is successfully established.

4. Every wireless device has fine print instructions buried in its user manual that specify a distance between the device and user that should not be surpassed.

Top 10 Facts about Cell Phone and Wi-Fi

For example, most cell phone manuals state the phone should be held at specified distance (often around 5/8th of an inch) from the body. If you look in the user manual for your DECT cordless home phone, wireless laptop or printer, it will state that the device should be at least 20 cm (approximately 8 inches) away from the body to prevent “exceeding FCC radiation exposure limits”. These instructions are in the user manuals because cell phones and wireless devices are tested for user radiation exposures at those specific distances.

In other words, if you are using a laptop on your lap, you are exposing yourself to untested radiation emissions that could exceed the radiation levels our government regulations presently allow. When you use a device closer than the manufacturer’s distance instructions, you risk exposing yourself to radiation levels that our federal government understands can cause sterility, brain damage and tissue damage. Learn more about the fine print warnings on various devices here.

5. These fine print instructions DO NOT protect you from all health effects.

Top 10 Facts about Cell Phone and Wi-Fi
The instructions buried in your manual are not safe enough. Even if you follow these instructions, you risk your health. Note: radiation exposure at the specified distances is much higher than zero. Accumulating research now shows a myriad of health effects occur at levels far far below (literally tens of thousands times lower than) government regulation limits. Wireless devices were not adequately tested before they came on the market.

6. Research shows low levels of this radiation impact the brain and reproductive system.

Top 10 Facts about Cell Phone and Wi-Fi
Wireless radiation has been shown to change brain function even at levels hundreds of thousands of times below federal guidelines. In 2011, Dr. Volkow’s NIH research showed that the brain increased glucose metabolism when exposed to cell phone radiation. Dr. Suleyman Kaplan has published multiple research studies showing damaged brain development in the offspring of prenatally exposed test subjects. Significant research shows that wireless exposures decrease and damage sperm and that prenatal exposure can alter testis and ovarian development. These are just a few examples from a large body of accumulated science which shows effects from cell phone and wireless radiation.

7. Radiation emitted by cell phones and wireless is officially linked to cancer.

Top 10 Facts about Cell Phone and Wi-Fi
In 2011, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer first classified cell phone and wireless radiation as a “class 2 B Possible Human Carcinogen” based on these research studies that showed long-term users of cell phones had higher rates of brain cancer on the side of the head where they held the phone.

8.The evidence linking wireless radiation to cancer has significantly increased since 2011.

Top 10 Facts about Cell Phone and Wi-Fi

In 2016, a major US government study found cell phone radiation caused increased cancers (brain and heart nerve) in rats exposed at low levels for two years. The results were stunning because the cancers the rats developed are the same type humans are developing after long term cell phone use.

Furthermore, since 2011, new research studies have been published linking wireless radiation to cancer. CERENAT (a case control national study in France) again showed a statistically significant association between glioma (brain cancer) and long-erm cell phone use. Another study (which replicated previous study results) showed that RF acted as a tumor promoter. The study details in its conclusion how, “Numbers of tumors of the lungs and livers in exposed animals were significantly higher than in sham-exposed controls. In addition, lymphomas were also found to be significantly elevated by exposure.”

In light of this published science, several World Health Organization experts are stating that the evidence has now substantially increased. Dr. Anthony B. Miller has testified as to the increased evidence, and he and colleagues have written several published papers detailing their opinion. Dr. Hardell states that wireless “should be regarded as human carcinogen requiring urgent revision of current exposure guidelines.”

9. Solutions exist: Hundreds of scientists worldwide recommend taking precautions to reduce exposures to wireless devices because of the serious risk these devices pose to public health.

Top 10 Facts about Cell Phone and Wi-Fi
In 2015, over 200 scientists and medical doctors signed onto a formal Appeal to the United Nations and the World Health Organization, calling on them to take immediate action on this issue. In 2014, a group of U.S. physicians, including the Chief of Obstetrics at Yale Medicine, helped launch The BabySafe Project, issuing specific recommendations to pregnant women on how to decrease wireless exposures in order to decrease risks to babies’ brain development. We do not have to give up our technology but we can make smarter choices about the way we use it. Every person can easily decrease exposure to this radiation by making simple changes every day.

10. Government regulations are outdated and antiquated.

In the United States, the last review for radio frequency limits was in 1996, and the reality is that these are limits are based on research from the 1980s. Many countries are using guidelines developed by the IEEE or ICNIRP—guidelines that have remained unchanged for decades. Those guidelines do not consider the more current science showing harm.Regulations are antiquated because they have not kept pace with the manner in which consumers use devices—usage has changed considerably since 1996. For example, the regulations only consider one radiating device at a time and do not account for a residence, classroom, or workplace, healthcare, retail, recreational and other venues filled with multiple devices. The regulations do not consider that people carry their cell phones tightly in a front pocket of jeans or in a bra. They do not consider that laptops would be placed on laps by schoolchildren in the classroom. Regulations did not consider research that looked at long-term exposures to children or medically compromised individuals. Guidelines were set by only considering the impact to a full-grown man.

Final Bonus Fact: No safe level of this radiation has been identified.

Scientific studies have not been done to develop a “safe level” of exposure. The latest science clearly shows that biological effects could occur at non-thermal (non-heating) levels. Science also shows that children and the developing pregnancy are far more vulnerable to these damaging effects. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) did not do research necessary to define a safe level that the public can be exposed to without harmful effects.

In a 2015 study (replicating prior scientific findings linking RF to cancer promotion), the researchers state, “Since many of the tumor-promoting effects in our study were seen at low to moderate exposure levels (0.04 and 0.4 W/kg SAR), thus well below exposure limits for the users of mobile phones, further studies are warranted to investigate the underlying mechanisms.” and “We hypothesize that these tumor-promoting effects may be caused by metabolic changes due to exposure. Our findings may help to understand the repeatedly reported increased incidences of brain tumors in heavy users of mobile phones.”

No medical organization has determined a “safe level” of this radiation for long-term exposure to children.

LEARN MORE

EHT has developed webpages to inform consumers on this issue and to document the scientific research in full. Please learn more about the fine print instructions on all cell phones and wireless devices on our Fine Print Warnings Page. Get your questions answered on our Cell Phone FAQ page.

Color Charts From the BioInitiative Report: Interested in what health effects the research shows at different radiation levels? These charts put into order scientific research conducted at various radiation exposure levels so you can see at a glance the effects found. Read the full Bioinitiative 2012 Report here. Read the color charts here.

Cell Phone Right to Know Ordinance Berkeley Council Briefing: This document reviews the need for public awareness of the fine print warning for cell phones. Berkeley City Officials were given this document to be informed on the issue, and the end result was the historic passing of the Berkeley Cell Phone Right to Know Ordinance. Click to Read.

Environmental Health Trust Briefing on Children and Wireless in Schools: This document pulls together research on the risks to children in the school setting and details the solutions schools can implement so that radiation exposures are reduced in schools. Dozens of research studies are indexed to backup the assertions of risk. Click to Read.

RELATED ARTICLES

Vitality Magazine: The Link Between Wireless Radiation and a Host of Serious Illnesses by Frank Clegg

Planet JH: New study shows cell phones cook your brain by Dr. Devra Davis

WiFi In Schools: Are We Playing It Safe With Our Kids? ,The Santa Clara County Medical Association Bulletin March/April 2015

GQ: Warning: Your Cell Phone May Be Hazardous to Your Health

Consumer Reports: Does Smartphone Radiation Cause Cancer?

Check Out These Excellent Websites

Parents and Citizens Around the World Are Raise Awareness. Please take the time to familiarize yourself with these other websites and groups.

Websites about WIFI in Schools

The National Association for Children and Safe Technology

Please register your group in their directory! ​

The Environmental Health Trust​ Schools and Safe Technology Page

Means For Change: Detailing efforts Worldwide and in Washington State.

WiFi in Schools UK
WiFi in Schools Australia
WiFi in Schools(USA)
Safe In Schools

Safe School Committee (Canada)
SSITA Safe Schools Information Technology Alliance
Doctors for Safer Schools
Escuela Sin Wifi (in Spanish)
RF-EMF(USA)
Parents for Safe Schools (Canada)

Electrosensitivity Ireland

EMFacts.com, Dr. Don Maisch (Australian expert) ParentsAgainstWiFiinSchools.com.au – Facebook

Powerwatch.org.uk – WiFi overview

www.weepinitiative.org – Canadian Initiative on EMR
www.ideaireland.org– Irish Dr’s Environmental Association

Must Know Websites!

Antenna Search
​Ever wonder how many cell towers are nearby? Just type in any US address and get the towers and antennas within a 4 mile radius.

Microwave News

Microwave News reports is recognized as a top on objective source of information on EMFs and health.

Electromagnetic Radiation Safety
Dr. Joel Moskowitz of UC Berkeley School of Public Health maintains the excellent blog.

Environment and Human Health
EHHI hosts a very informative Cell Phone Report downloadable by Top Doctors.

Lennart Hardell’s Blog
Dr. Hardell is the internationally respected scientist whose research the International Agency for the Research on Cancer cited in it’s classification of RF as a possible carcinogen.

Canadians for Safe Technology
Canadians for Safe Technology is headed up by the former Canadian Microsoft President Frank Clegg.

Citizens for Safe Technology
Citizens for Safe Technology Society is a not-for-profit educational society made up of Canadian and U.S. parents, grandparents, teachers, business professionals, physicians, scientists, politicians and lawyers!

We defeated the proposal to further erode local zoning in California. The stakes are even higher now!

Spread the word! Post links to this page http://www.electricalpollution.com/Stop5G.html and articles like the one in O’Dwyers http://www.odwyerpr.com/story/public/7175/2016-06-30/5g-rollout-worries-wi-fi-health-advocates.html

The FCC voted to move forward with 5G, an extremely dangerous technology. Read Chairman Wheelers comments about the Spectrum Frontiers Proceeding (https://www.fcc.gov/document/remarks-chairman-wheeler-future-wireless). This would put 5G transmitters on power and light poles throughout communities across the United States with the aim of creating enough saturation of very high frequency microwave radiation that fiber optic level connectivity is available wirelessly everywhere.

Thank you to all who contacted the FCC Commissioners in opposition. While we figure out the best ways in which to move forward, please help to raise awareness of the National Toxicology Program results showing that wireless radiation is carcinogenic and breaks DNA.

We need everyone to educate their Congresspeople and opponents in the election about the dangers of wireless radiation. We also need everyone to file comments in opposition to 5G in the relevant dockets. The FDA is supposed to put out warnings in light of the National Toxicology Program results showing that wireless radiation is carcinogenic and breaks DNA. They are dragging their feet. Please write them as well.

For more information visit: http://www.parentsforsafetechnology.org/stop-5g-spectrum-frontiers.html


Background and Contact Information Please take a moment to contact the FCC Commissioners BEFORE their vote on July 14 in opposition to the rollout of 5G. A template letter is below, please take a moment personalize it briefly with your experience to give it greater impact.

Tom Wheeler, Chairman Tom.Wheeler@fcc.gov

Mignon Clyburn, Commissioner Mignon.Clyburn@fcc.gov

Jessica Rosenworcel, Commissioner Jessica.Rosenworcel@fcc.gov

Ajit Pai, Commissioner Ajit.Pai@fcc.gov

Michael O’Rielly, Commissioner Mike.O’Rielly@fcc.gov

Distribute this press release: FCC Fast Tracks 5G Spectrum Despite Wireless/Cancer Link & DNA Damage Found in $25 Million US Government Study via social media and directly to news outlets.

Please send a copy of your letter to your U.S. Representative and Senators and the relevant committees (listed below).

Ultimately, it is Congress that decided to give sole responsibility for wireless promotion and safety to an industry dominated agency. It is essential that they hear from you. Only they can give authority for health back to the EPA, which has tried in the past to protect the public. Congress defunded EPA and removed its authority to protect the public from wireless radiation to stop it (http://www.stopglobalwifi.org/documents/PressReleaseDec2015.pdf).

Contact your Congressional Delegation (2 Senators and 1 Representative) Look them up and find their phone and FAX numbers at: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm and http://www.house.gov/representatives/

Call the White House – 202-456-1111. Ask President Obama to halt the rollout of 5G in light of the safety hazards.

President Obama can also be emailed using the form at http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/submit-questions-and-comments

Congressional Committees – ask for oversight hearings on dangers of societal saturation with radiation from wireless technology:
U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions – (202)-224-5375
http://www.help.senate.gov/ links to contact the two ranking members on webpage
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, & Transportation – Majority: 202-224-1251, Minority: 202-224-0411
U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources – (202) 224-4971
House Energy and Commerce Committee – (202) 225-2927
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Phone: (202) 225-5074

Dear FCC Commissioners,

Spectrum Frontiers Proceeding is being represented as an unqualified good, but it is not. It will do great harm to human health and the environment.

Please vote “no” to the Spectrum Frontiers Proceeding. There has been no NEPA review of the environmental and human health impacts of moving forward with 5G. The FCC has put the cart before the horse in promulgating rules for 5G without first studying the safety of 5G for humans and the environment. There is consensus within the scientific community that the existing FCC limits for wireless radiation do not protect the population from biological effects (www.EMFscientist.org)

The National Toxicology Program recently release results showing that radiofrequency radiation (RFR) can indeed both break DNA and cause cancer (http://www.saferemr.com/2016/05/national-toxicology-progam-finds-cell.html and http://microwavenews.com/news-center/ntp-nyt). Furthermore, the literature on RFR in the very high frequency bands required for 5G document DNA breakages, serious cellular resonance effects, and other detrimental metabolic effects (http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec15_2012_Evidence_Disruption_Modulation.pdf and http://www.stopglobalwifi/documents/2001_kositsky_et_al._-_ussr_review.pdf).

Non-industry funded studies have consistently found links between RFR and various negative biological effects (www.bioinitiative.org). They include serious neurological, cardiac, and metabolic effects, as well as DNA breakage which can lead to cancer and genetic defects (http://www.mainecoalitiontostopsmartmeters.org/?p=1469).

Studies, including the National Toxicology Program studies, have shown wireless to be a dangerous technology and 5G, according to Chairman Wheeler’s own comments, is an infrastructure intensive technology. So, invest in safe, wired infrastructure instead of spending a lot of money to saturate entire communities with hazardous radiation. The “cool” factor is not worth the peril.

Please see “Wireless Technology Violates Human Rights” (http://www.electricalpollution.com/documents/WirelessViolatesHumanRights2016.pdf) for more information about the very serious ways in which wireless technology violates human rights.

Don’t vote to unleash a dangerous environmental pollutant on your friends, family, and, indeed, the whole country. Vote to protect your family, friends, and the country – vote “no” on Spectrum Frontiers. Be on the right side of history.

Sincerely,

For additional information, please visit http://www.parentsforsafetechnology.org/stop-5g-spectrum-frontiers.html

Distribute this press release: FCC Fast Tracks 5G Spectrum Despite Wireless/Cancer Link & DNA Damage Found in $25 Million US Government Study

Electromagnetic fields & radiation articles
[back] Death towers [back] Articles

[vid 2017 June] Cell Phone Carriers Do NOT Want You To See This! – Cell Towers Exposed!

[vid] PROOF: CELL PHONE TOWERS ARE WEAPONS USED TO SEDATE, EXCITE, MAKE ILL OR KILL

[2015] EMR – A BEGINNER’S GUIDE – ROGER H. MOLLER

[2011] U.S. SILENTLY TORTURES AMERICANS WITH CELL TOWER ELECTROMAGNETIC NEUROWEAPON

[2013 Jan] If WiFi and cell phone radiation are safe, why has Belgium’s telecomm boss banned them from his offices?

[vid] Indian Govt puts stringent mobile radiation norms into force The new regulations regarding radiation emissions from cellular towers and mobile phones come into effect from today, making India one among the few countries in the world to have stringent Electromagnetic Frequency Radiation Standards. In the interest of public health, the Indian standards are now 10 times more stringent than over 90 per cent of the countries. The EMF exposure limit for Base Station Emissions has been lowered to one tenth of the existing level.

[2012] Neurosurgeon Shows How Low Levels of Radiation Such As Wi-Fi, Smart Meters And Cell Phones Cause The Blood Brain Barrier To Leak

[2012 Oct] ‘I had turned into this old, frail man overnight’

[2012 Jan EW] Cell Phone Signal Source

Remote Mind Control

[2011 Oct] Misleading Danish Mobile Phones and Brain Tumour Study in BMJ

[2010 Nov] Is Wi-Fi frying our brains? Fears that cloud of ‘electrosmog’ could be harming humans By Alasdair Philips

[2009 EW] For those gifted to see the energy around towers Before a tower is gifted I see dark to black shape clouds hanging around the boxes attached to the towers. I’ve seen various shape devices and see this dark matter usually on the outer side of them. Sometimes I see it come and go and what looks like a thick rod shooting up above the tower. All this dark matter seems to pulsate and fluctuate but it’s constantly there. Once I gift the tower I have seen from 10 to minutes later those dark clouds seem to be gone and in there place I see white energy similar in shape to the previous dark matter. Sometimes above the tower I see a little pink mixed in the the new white energy.

[2009] Dirty Electricity and the Link to Cancer by Donna Fisher

INSOMNIA: How to get major relief in 43 hours—without sleeping pills, herbs or vitamins.

[pdf 2009] Observations from a Psychotherapy Practice on Mobile Telecommunications and DECT Telephones by Dr. med. Christine Aschermann Later several patients were diagnosed with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), fibromyalgia or multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome (MCS). In several others, there was a persistent Epstein Barr virus infection, the so-called glandular fever. However, it did not present in its classic form, but rather in its chronic form that often is not detected by the doctors.”

[2009 March] 40,000 BRAIN TUMOUR PATIENTS ‘MISSING’ FROM OFFICIAL STATISTICS EACH YEAR

“Cell Tower Infrastructure”
This seems to me to be rather excessive. Watts = Volts x Amps Therefore, 240 volts x’s 800 amps = 192 Kilowatts per hour x’s 3 phase = 576 KWH. Transmitters at microwave frequencies normal only require a max of 1.0 watt, not kilo watts. If this is true then there is covert agenda going on. This type of supply and fusing system will be mega expensive. I don’t know what to say, except run for the hills. Power is a square law, i.e. Amps (squared) x’s Resistance in ohms. So if you double the voltage you square the power. Nasty.”–Electrical engineer

[June 2008] SUICIDES ‘LINKED TO PHONE MASTS’

[EW March 2008] What Does This Mean?

[EW Oct 5, 2006]A Trillion ‘Lost’ Pentagon Dollars Equals a few Million Death Towers? – Don Croft

[EW May 12, 2006] Death Towers: ‘The Emperor has no Clothes!’–Don Croft

‘What Are ‘Death Towers?’—Don Croft
Every standing tower in the world, pretty much, can be seen by energy sensitives and psychics to give off very dense, destructive dead Orgone radiation–the energy of death and decay. Ordinary communication transmitters, even the huge microwave transmitters, only gave off a little bit of that energy, if any, and all radio and TV towers were drafted into the HAARP network in recent years, so they’re death transmitters. The difference between HAARP and your neighbourhood death tower is that HAARP shoots the DOR up into the atmosphere and the neighbourhood towers direct it down at the surrounding population. High tension power lines, even though they’re known to kill people with cancer if they live too close, also only give off a little bit of DOR. That’s why I call them ‘death towers.’ Most folks call them ‘cellphone towers’ but in fact any rational person understands that even primary cell transmitters require no more power than your apartment or house does, so the bundle of massive cables that run from the fortified blockhouses to the towers’ death energy producing panels, rods, drums and dishes should be suspect.

Death Tower Blockhouse Electrical Data… [March 2005]
Psychic Attacks Through Mind Towers–Highlander

Scientific research concerning human well-being and health in the vicinity of phone masts

Gifting (spreading orgonite devices)

[pdf] Tamara J Mariea1 and George L Carlo. Wireless Radiation in the Etiology and Treatment of Autism: Clinical Observations and Mechanisms. J. Aust. Coll. Nutr. & Env. Med. Vol. 26 No.2 (August 2007) pages 3-7

Articles re mind control
Mind Control Now ‘On The Air’, Sept. 25, 2004
ELF Towers by Don Croft & Ken Adachi The whole damn dumb show was supposed to go down in late 99, but they didn’t get people’s guns, that big final obstacle to fascism. That’s when they hit upon these ELF towers. Tested them in Ventura, Africa, and the Sudan. They had GWEN operational in ’92, but it did entire counties and would affect their own people, who have body suits they were (lined with lead-impregnated kevlar- which blocks elf and piggyback freqs.). So they found out that the little towers, by the tens of thousands, they could literally aim any energy like a gun to a single home, a given range area, and so forth.

IN YOUR HEAD: EXPERIMENTS INTO REMOTE MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGY by Jim Keith (An excerpt from his book Mind Control – World Control.)

TETRA System: Mass UK Mind Control Technology and the Zombification Of Britain’s Police is Now A Reality by Tim Rifat
[2001] Mass UK Mind Control Technology Now A Reality By Tim Rifat
The Secret Use Of Microwaves By British Police And Army By Tim Rifat

Total Population Control by Nicholas Jones (July 12, 2002)

New World Order and E.L.F. Psychotronic Tyranny by C.B. Baker

Articles re surveillance &assassinations
[Media 2002] Roke to adapt mobile networks for radar
[Media 2002] How mobile phones let spies see our every move

[2006] Security Experts’ ‘Suicides’ Called Into Question — European Media Probe Dangers of Secret Surveillance Systems in March of 2005, Costas Tsalikidis, a 38-year-old software engineer for Vodaphone in Greece had just discovered a highly sophisticated bug embedded in the company’s mobile network. The spyware eavesdropped on the prime minister’s and other top officials’ cell phone calls; it even monitored the car phone of Greece’s secret service chief. Others bugged included civil rights activists, the head of Greece’s “Stop the War” coalition, journalists and Arab businessmen based in Athens. All the wiretapping began about two months before the Olympics were hosted by Greece in August 2004, according to a subsequent investigation by the Greek authorities.
Tsalikidis, according to friends and family, was excited about his work and was looking forward to marrying his longtime girlfriend. But on March 9, 2005, his elderly mother found him hanging from a white rope tied to pipes outside of his apartment bathroom. His limp feet dangled a mere three inches above the floor. His death was ruled a suicide. The next day, Vodaphone’s top executive in Greece reported to the prime minister that unknown outsiders had illicitly eavesdropped on top government officials. Before making his report, however, the CEO had the spyware destroyed, even though this destroyed the evidence as well.
— the Vodaphone eavesdropping was transmitted in real time via four antennae located near the U.S. embassy in Athens, according to an 11-month Greek government investigation. Some of these transmissions were sent to a phone in Laurel, Md., near America’s National Security Agency.
— according to Ta Nea, a Greek newspaper, Vodaphone’s CEO privately told the Greek government that the bugging culprits were “U.S. agents.” Because Greece’s prime minister feared domestic protests and a diplomatic war with the United States, he ordered the Vodafone CEO to withhold this conclusion from his own authorities investigating the case

TETRA, power lines & Cell phone
Live and Extremely Dangerous by Professor Denis Henshaw He estimates that power lines notch up the following grim tally each year: eight cases of childhood leukaemia, 14 cases of skin cancer, up to 400 cases of lung cancer, several thousand cases of illnesses associated with air pollution ( such as respiratory disease, allergies and aggravated asthma), 9,000 cases of depression and 60 suicides. The vast majority of these cases, he says, are caused by electrical effects, not by the magnetic fields that were under investigation by the NRPB. “These are figures comparable to the number killed on roads” But road deaths are spread throughout the country, while only one in 50 of the population lives under power lines. So the rate of casualty here is 50 times greater than the risk of being on the road.”….People who accuse you of scaremongering are those who don’t want the truth to come out. The utility companies can never admit in public that there is an effect, because that would be admitting liability.”

Gallery of Shame. Evidence That Even the NRPB Can’t Ignore

Cellular Towers – A Medical Issue by B Blake Levitt

[August 2004] TETRA: A Critical Overview into the death of Officer Neil Dring –B Trower
Confidential Report on TETRA for the Police of England and Wales by B Trower

[Oct 2002] Basingstoke and Deane MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INQUIRY –G.J. Hyland
The Physiological and Environmental Effects of Non-ionising Electromagnetic Radiation by G.J. Hyland
[December, 2000] How Exposure to GSM & TETRA Base-station Radiation can Adversely Affect Humans by G J Hyland

[March 2001] Alasdair Philips, Director of Powerwatch, examines the potential hazards of TETRA… The negative aspects of TETRA
BDBC LOCAL INQUIRY 10th OCTOBER 2002 PRESENTATION by Alasdair Philips
Mobile Phone Adverse Health Concerns by Alasdair Philips

[June 2000] The Health effects associated with mobile base stations in communities: the need for health studies : Dr. Neil Cherry
[April 2000] Safe exposure levels by Dr. Neil Cherry (In Word format)
Evidence that Electromagnetic Radiation is Genotoxic: The implications for the epidemiology of cancer and cardiac, neurological and reproductive effects by Dr Neil Cherry

The Largest Biological Experiment Ever By Arthur Firstenberg
[1997] Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) Killing Fields –ARTHUR FIRSTENBERG
Microwaving Our Planet: The Environmental Impact of the Wireless Revolution by ARTHUR FIRSTENBERG 1997

[TEAC Press Release 8th Sept 2004] Childhood leukaemia risk doubles within 100 metres of high voltage power lines – damning results known for 3 years.

ELF-Electromagnetic Disease Transmission by C.B. Baker

[pdf] The health effects of electrical pollution pdf
Electromagnetic Stress in the Home—Jacqueline Beacon
Harmful Effects from Earth Radiation & Electrical Fields by Alf Riggs

BDBC LOCAL INQUIRY 10th OCTOBER 2002 PRESENTATION BY CHRIS MAILE – CfPS Chair

Clusters by Mast Sanity

Gallery of Shame Evidence That Even the NRPB Can’t Ignore

B Trower Letter re TETRA phone mast applications

Lancashire Crime Scene Investigator Dies of Throat Cancer – Official (Known to be TETRA Handset User)

Milligauss Readings and Health Issues

Are you and your children guinea pigs?

[2004] Radiation risk ‘underplayed’ to avoid compensation payouts
Dr Keith Baverstock, who was the World Health Organisation’s senior radiation adviser in Europe, says that science has been “perverted for political ends” by government agencies which should be protecting public health……”It is sad that the NRPB, which should be an independent body, was complicit .”

[1992] ELF-Electromagnetic Disease Transmission by C.B. Baker

Power lines
Brodeur Testifies Before Nebraska Legislature. Provides Evidence that Power Line EMF’s Cancer Link is Conclusive

Paul Brodeur: historian and crusader – crusader-investigative reporter-historian who specializes in chronicling risk of microwave radiation

External
FORWARD to Mast Sanity website

Response to SCENIHR’s “Opinion on possible effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) on human health.”
Professor Denis L Henshaw and Professor Mike J O’Carroll, posted 3rd November 2006.

Critique of the HPA’s “What About the Effects of EMFs on Melatonin and Breast Cancer? A Set of Frequently Asked Questions”[PDF] Professor Denis Henshaw, posted 3rd October 2006.

Adverse health effects associated with exposure to ELF electric and magnetic fields – assembly to scientific evidence and discussion of possible public health impact. Professors M. J. O’Carroll and D. L. Henshaw. DRAFT – WORK IN PROGRESS – Version 1 29/6/06.

Response to Health Protecion Agency – Radiation Protection Division Report on Melatonin.
Critique by Prof. Denis Henshaw, 16th June 2006.

Response to the Draper Report – This is Professor Henshaw’s reponse to the 2005 report which found an increased incidence of childhood leukaemia up to 600m from powerlines in the UK.

Do magnetic fields cause increased risk of childhood leukaemia via melatonin disruption? Denis L. Henshaw and Russel J. Reiter, 2005.
Paper presented at the World Health Organisation meeting in Istanbul, June 2004, on EMFs and Child Health.
Since published in Bioelectromagnetics, Supplement 7, S86-S97.

The case for prudent avoidance – Professor Henshaw argues the case for prudent avoidance of exposure to power frequency magnetic fields similar to that introduced in Sweden, Switzerland and three Italian regions.

California Health Department Report – Classifying five health effects as possibly causal (class 2B in the IARC classification) in relation increased risk with power frequency magnetic field exposures: childhood leukaemia, adult leukaemia, adult brain cancer, miscarriages and Amyotropic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS or motor neuron disease) aswell as possible other illnesses.

California Health Department Report: Summary and Commentary by Professor Denis Henshaw (PDF file: 463 KB)

Stakeholders Advisory Group on ELF-EMFs (SAGE) website:. A group set up by the UK Minister of Public Health to examine precaution against public exposure to power frequency electric and magnetic fields below the current ICNIRP limit.

1) 34 Scientific Studies Showing Adverse Health Effects From Wi-Fi:
http://wifiinschools.org.uk/30.html

2) Several thousand studies that indicate a biological effect and/or harm:
http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/science/studies.asp
http://www.justproveit.net/studies
http://www.emf-portal.de
http://stopsmartmeters.org.uk/resources/resources-scientific-studies-into-the-health-effects-of-emr/

3) Radiofrequency science charts to visually compare studies, radiation intensities and biological effects:
http://www.bioinitiative.org/rf-color-charts/

4) Apple manual states to keep your iPhone away from your body at all times:
http://www.newsweek.com/iphone-6-bendgate-apple-says-your-iphone-shouldnt-go-your-pocket-avoid-273313

5) Study: Mobile phones are cooking men’s sperm:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/12167957/Mobile-phones-are-cooking-mens-sperm.html

6) Brain surgeon Dr Charlie Teo warns against mobiles, wireless home appliances:
http://www.news.com.au/technology/brain-surgeon-dr-charlie-teo-warns-against-mobiles-home-appliances/story-e6frfro0-1225791947213

7) American Academy of Pediatrics warns: Limit children’s exposure to cellphones:
http://www.today.com/video/pediatricians-warn-limit-childrens-exposure-to-cellphones-559871555807

8) More than 60 international warnings on Wi-Fi and microwave radiation:
http://www.safeinschool.org/2011/01/international-warnings-on-wi-fi.html

9) A List of Teacher Unions and Parent Teacher Organizations Taking Action On Wi-Fi (USA, Canada, UK, etc):
http://safetechforschoolsmaryland.blogspot.com/2016/02/teacher-unions-and-parent-teacher.html

10) TED Talk from a former Environmental Engineer in Silicon Valley:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0NEaPTu9oI

11) Insurance giant Swiss RE has given electromagnetic frequencies the HIGHEST possible long term risk rating:
https://takebackyourpower.net/major-insurance-firm-swiss-re-warns-of-large-losses-from-unforeseen-consequences-of-wireless-technologies/

12) Another insurance giant, Lloyd’s of London, will not insure anything wireless:
http://www.naturalhealth365.com/wi-fi-radiation-electromagnetic-fields-lloyds-of-london-1356.html

13) Risk Management Magazine – The Invisible Threat: Radiofrequency Radiation Risk
http://www.rmmagazine.com/2010/08/01/the-invisible-threat-radiofrequency-radiation-risk/

14) US CDC retracts cellphone radiation warning following pressure from industry lobbyists:
http://microwavenews.com/news-center/caution-vs-precaution

15) WHO involved in suppression of additional science showing harm, since 2011:
https://takebackyourpower.net/tag/who/

16) Study Uncovers How Electromagnetic Fields Amplify Pain in Amputees
www.utdallas.edu/news/2016/2/3-31891_Study-Uncovers-How-Electromagnetic-Fields-Amplify-_story-wide.html

17) CEO of 1 Billion-dollar U.K. company speaks out on microwave sickness:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4DKNs0G2kU

18) Dozens of specific scientific abstracts that all show harm:
http://emfsafetynetwork.org/shortcut-to-science/

19) Solutions: Reducing Wirelesss Radiation and EMF
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWCk7RYGGS4

20) Solutions: Reducing Your EMF Exposure
http://www.emfanalysis.com/solutions-interview/

21) Cell Phone Radiation Boosts Cancer Rates in Animals; $25 Million NTP Study Finds Brain Tumors
http://microwavenews.com/news-center/ntp-cancer-results

Letter of Notice on 5G for Government  Officials

Switxerland halts 5G

Stop 5G Global Protest Day:  Saturday January 25 2020

Witness of 5G-type scanner machine:

EHS symptoms including cancer, and burnt from the inside:

5G Phones: 
The Pixel 4 range, release slated for fall 2019,  will likely include the Snapdragon 855, a chipset that’s capable of supporting 5G connections for 60 GHz Wi-Fi.

Radar Phones Need New Raised FCC Short-Term Heating Limits:

“Google notes that “Motion Sense will be available in select Pixel countries,” which probably indicates that Soli will have some regulatory hurdles to overcome.
​Soli operates in the 57- to 64-GHz frequency band, and in the US, Google had to get the FCC to lift power limitations in those bands so Soli could work better. If an international regulatory body is not as accommodating as the FCC, it sounds like the Pixel 4’s Soli capabilities will be shut off in that country.”

5G Crisis:

Safe Alternative to 5G:

5G poster:

  • 5G Flyer (Digital Survivor UK, March 2019)

5G video:

5G contravenes Human Rights Conventions:

5G appears illegal on four grounds:

1. 5G is a breach of the Nuremberg Code, which requires informed consent (UN, 1950).

2. The United Nations’ International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, article 7, prohibits medical and scientific experimentation without consent. The ICNIRP chair, Dr E van Rongen, has stated of 5G that “It is not set up as a public health experiment but of course you can consider it as such.”  (Margi Murphy: Sunday Telegraph, March 3 2019)
3. Under many government requirements, e.g. EU law, a Strategic Environmental Assessment should have been carried out before the implementation of the 5G Wireless Network Technology was authorised. These are still awaited.

4. Most governments follow the Precautionary Principle, which requires potentially dangerous systems like 5G to be tested prior to authorization.

In addition most authorities cannot over-ride medical advise given by a qualified physician which requires the protection of individuals liable to injury from the toxic radiation.

5G Appeal to United Nations (PACE):

International EMF Scientist Appeal to UNEP:

European Union leading Scientists: Stop 5G
Scientists Lennart Hardell (Sweden) and Rainer Nyberg (Finland) wrote on May 20 2019 to Karmenu Vella, the EU Environment Commissioner, calling for a moratorium on the adoption of 5G and for the release information on the EU internal risk assessment of 5G and the application of the precautionary principle to this technique. They also demanded guidelines based on independent research and the EU documentation to prove that 5G is safe. Copies were sent to National Environment Ministers, Wildlife Conservation Society, World Wildlife Fund, The Nature Conservancy and Greenpeace.

Legal Action for ES people and others to stop 5G and other RF emissions (Tasmania, Australia):

Criminal Threat to Assault and Restraint Orders against neighbors and Telecom companies.

Forming a reasonable belief that the emissions form a risk of harm.

1.Identify the source of the emissions or proposed emissions (eg Wifi, baby monitor, smart meter, celltower, proposed development) 

2. Identify the site (eg home, workplace, hospital etc)

3. Measure the distance to the emissions from your home

4. Identitify the emitters, local council, land owner, comporations involved and company numbers, and directors who may be personally liable.

5. Collate all the correspondence

6. Ask you doctor to provide: 
(a) evidence that RF emissions are not safe or could be a risk of harm, including the risk of fear which is a discomfort, and
(b) recommendations for remediation (eg removing celltower, removing Wifi, removing smart meter etc),
using:   BioInitiative Report: https://bioinitiative.org  and Physicians for Safe Technology: https://mdsafetech.org/

7. Obtain witnesses affirmed testimony or affidavit, e.g. a friend’s cellphone visiting your home showing bars indicating reception on their phone

8. If you wish contact Building Biologist for survey, or get a specialist survey,

9. Include costs for shielding your home and yard as a compensation claim.

10. Collate all the evidence and Instruct your lawyer or attorney to form an advice for you, and give legal remedy or options etc. Most environmental acts classify EMR as a pollutant and contaminant, which require precautionary action. Local authorities may then be liable for personal injury, assault, environmental contmination, dangerous weapons,  

11. Send to the emitter and all parties.

EMR Legal Education

Other Legal Actions:

Denmark:

Ireland:

“Professor Tom Butler and the Irish Times” (247/2020, Press Ombudsman, January 7 2020)

Netherlands:

UK:

USA:

5G: ‘Top Emerging Risk’ (SwissRe), not covered by some underwriters:

5G crisis:

Phased array, directed energy:
The 5G transmitters allowed by the FCC use phased array and directed energy, giving an effective radiated power of up to 30,000 watts per 100 MHz of spectrum. Telecom companies could buy up to 3 GHz of contiguous spectrum and then emit up to 900,000 watts.

Brillouin precursors:

These 5G waves and their re-radiated quasi-static Brillouin precursors, first described by Léon Brillouin in 1914, radiate far into the human body causing severe adverse health effects. The group velocity approximation assumes that the carrier wave dominates when radiation enters lossy material, like water and human tissue. In fact the Brillouin precursors, according to  Professor Kurt Oughstun, can become the dominant factor on cell membranes, where under Brillouin calculations, using asymptotic mathematical analysis, the radiation at 50 cm deep in human brain tissue is 78 times stronger than under group velocity approximation theory. The signal can be reflected inside the skull and has been associated with brain tumors, along with a rise in breast cancer incidence recorded near phased array radar stations. Dr Oughstun commented in 2002 on secret USAF studies: ” these results raise several health and safety issues that the USAF is unable—or perhaps even unwilling—to address at this time. To be sure, our current safety standards for exposure to pulsed electromagnetic radiation have failed to consider these critical factors.”

​This deployment of 5G radiation could herald the end of city and downtown life as we know it.

Expert assessment of allowing 5G: ‘reckless in the extreme’:

  • “The new 5G wireless technology involves millimeter waves (extremely high frequencies) producing photons of much greater energy than even 4G and WiFi. Allowing this technology to be used without proving its safety is reckless in the extreme, as the millimetre waves are known to have a profound effect on all parts of the human body.”
        
    ​Prof. Trevor Marshall, Director Autoimmunity Research Foundation, California (ref.)

Wireless Industry beginning to recognize health dangers of 5G:
The power and locations needed for 5G wireless transmitters will make it difficult for the wireless industry to comply with many international safety limits. 

“Significant concern is emerging over the possible impact on health and safety arising from potentially much higher exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation arising from 5G. Increased exposure may result not only from the use of much higher frequencies in 5G but also from the potential for the aggregation of different signals, their dynamic nature, and the complex interference effects that may result, especially in dense urban areas.” 


“The 5G radio emission fields are quite different to those of previous generations because of their complex beamformed transmissions in both directions – from base station to handset and for the return. Although fields are highly focused by beams, they vary rapidly with time and movement and so are unpredictable, as the signal levels and patterns interact as a closed loop system. This has yet to be mapped reliably for real situations, outside the laboratory.”

International Appeals and Fights against 5G

Belgium Appeal

A group of doctors calls for the application of the precautionary principle In the face of the massive deployment of wireless technologies, health professionals are asking the government to apply the precautionary principle to protect the population and more particularly the most vulnerable groups, including pregnant women and children.

“Where there is a risk of serious or irreversible damage, the lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing the adoption of effective measures to prevent environmental degradation … “.
(Precautionary Principle, Rio Conference on Biological Diversity, 1992)

Canadian Appeal

German Appeal

Ireland call for 5G health review, defeated

Israel Protest

Italy

Poland

Switzerland Fight against 5G

UK Appeal

USA Appeal

USA Conference of Mayors:

USA National Associations and Leagues:

USA Cities and Counties sue FCC:

Los Angeles, Seattle, and 22 other cities and counties are suing the Federal Communications Commission over its move to limit local government fees on 5G network equipment applications.

USA:  FFC told to prove 5G is safe

Brendan Carr, a commissioner of the FCC, has been given until December 17 2018 by US Senator Richard Blumenthal and Rep. Anna Eshoo to prove that 5G is safe. The FCC’s limits date from from 1996 and are based on Schwan’s 1953 mistake about heating being the only effect, a hypothesis again disproved by the NTP study.

USA: Accusation of FCC of Colluding with Big Wireless

On January 24 2019, Frank Pallone, Chairman of the U.S. House Commerce Committee, sent a letter to the Federal Communications Commission asking for copies of communications between the FCC and the corporations involved in the current roll out of 5th Generation (5G) cellular technology. 

The UK Register reports Pallone’s letter:
“It has come to our attention that certain individuals at the FCC may have urged companies to challenge the order the Commission adopted in order to game the judicial lottery procedure and intimated the agency would look unfavorably towards entities that were not helpful.” 

Pallone’s letter claims that persons within the FCC put “pressure” on the “Big Wireless” telecommunications corporations, encouraging them to challenge a 5G-related rule in order to prevent it from ending up in a courtroom where it would likely be overturned. The goal, Pallone alleges, was to move the legal challenge out of the state of California to a more friendly judicial environment.

FCC Admits No Health Expertise:

It is extraordinary that the US agency allegedly responsible for the safety of RF communications equipment has no health expertise, It admits to relying on interested groups like the wireless industry trade organization, the IEEE, which promotes the use of wireless. The IEEE is not independent of the wireless industry, it is not primarily a health and safety organization, and it lacks physicians experienced in the diagnosis of real physiological electrosensitivity as opposed to psychological electrophobia. Some of its physicists still follow Schwan’s 1953 mistake that the only adverse effect of RF is heating one degree averaged over 6 minutes, a hypothesis long invalidated by the majority viewpoint scientists.

“The FCC relies on the expertise of health and safety agencies and organizations with respect to appropriate levels of RF exposure. Our current RF exposure limits incorporate recommendations from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and other federal health and safety agencies. And these limits are derived from exposure limits recommended by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc and the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.”

Studies:

How to avoid 5G: be Electrosensitive, and Protest like Firefighters
Even though the World Health Organization’s IARC classifies 5G as a 2B human carcinogen, and the preliminary NTP results have already confirmed that wirless is a cancer agent, US citizens still have no right to raise health objections against 5G under the extraordinary 1996 Telecommunications Act. Yet firefighters have been given exemption from having 5G towers. This is because they protested strongly after many became electrosensitive when they previously had wireless towers on their premises, exhibiting specific electrosensitivity symptoms, as confirmed by abnormal brain scans. 

Human race: extinction approaching

Prof. Martin Pall, an expert on human effects of RF radiation warns:

  • “DNA damage known to be produced by these EMFs occur in human sperm and may also occur in human eggs, leading to large increases in mutation in any children born. It is thought that an increase in mutation frequency of 2.5 to 3-fold will lead to extinction because of accumulation of large numbers of damaging mutations. We may already be over this level, and if so, simply continuing our current exposures will lead to eventual extinction. Further increases in exposures will be more rapidly self-destructive.”
                       Prof. Martin Pall: “Letter to California Legislators” (August 7 2017)
  • Prof. M Pall: “List of 134 Reviews on Non-thermal Effects of Microwave/Intermediate Frequency EMFs” (August 2017)

Australia

Austria:

Canada:

Sidewalk Toronto: 5G Waterfront Toronto and Sidewalks Labs Project:

Europe

  • Harald Schumann and Elisa Simantke: “Europe Ignores Possible Cancer Risk of 5G” (Tagesspiegel, January 12 2019; TBH trans. January 14 2019)
    Harald Schumann and Elisa Simantke: “How harmful is 5G really? 5G should transfer huge amounts of data quickly. But it could also harm your health. Europe’s governments ignore the danger” ( Der Tagesspiegel, January 15 2019)
  • “I live in Vienna, Austria, where the 5G rollout is suddenly upon us.
    Within the last five weeks, pre-5G has been officially announced at Vienna airport and 5G at the Rathausplatz, the main square in Vienna, which attracts tens of thousands of visitors to its Christmas market each December and skating rink each January, which are special treats for children. Along with birds and insects, children are the most vulnerable to 5G depredation because of their little bodies.
    ​Friends and acquaintances and their children in Vienna are already reporting the classic symptoms of EMR poisoning: nosebleeds, headaches, eye pains, chest pains, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, tinnitus, dizziness, flu-like symptoms, and cardiac pain. They also report a tight band around the head; pressure on the top of the head; short, stabbing pains around the body; and buzzing internal organs. Other biological effects such as tumours and dementia usually take longer to manifest, but in the case of 5G, which has never been tested for health or safety, who knows?”
           Claire Edwards: “UN Staff Member says 5G is War on Humanity” (ES-Ireland, January 3 2019)

Brussels:

Germany:

Greece:

Ireland:

Italy:

New Zealand:

Papua New Guinea

Halt to 5G:

Switzerland:

The Swiss Council of States on March 5 2018 refused to relax an ordinance on radiation emitted by mobile phone antennas. Switzerland will thus keep an ordinance fixing the maximum values of non-ionizing radiation that are ten times lower than in the European Union. 

UK

In England the City of London Corporation made the extraordinary claim that King’s College stated that 5G “700MHz and 26GHz have no impact on living beings” but that “studies have not been done yet”.

Bournemouth:

Brighton & Hove:

Frome:

Glastonbury Town, Wells city, Mendip District, England:

Glastonbury Festival, England:

House of Commons:

  • 5G: Health Hazards:Written question – 234268 (March 2019)
  • Chief Medical Officer for England, Professor Dame Sally Davis, in answer to Stephen Metcalfe MP, chair of the Science and Technology Committee, about the health effects of 5G (June 6 2019, Transcript question 52, Video 10:17:52):
        “We know that our present system is safe and this is only going up a bit.”

Devon County Council:

  • June 12 2019: 6 questions from members of the public asking for proof of safety of 5G and risk assessments carried out by Devon County Council.

Paignton: 

Stronsay:

Totnes:

Wells:​
Wells City Council minutes (November 28 2019)

UK government ignores the science showing 5G and RF is a proven cancer agent:

UK government removes local control of 5G:

USA:

California   

216 out of 400 cities and 34 out of 57 counties opposed the bill SB 649. It was passed on July 12 2017 but vetoed by Gov. Jerry Brown on October 15 2017.

Colorado:

Hawaii:

Louisiana:

Marin County, California:

New York:

Jim Staney: “Verizon Fighting To Install 100’s of 5G Networks on Syracuse Street Lights” (PrepForThat, May 11 2019)

Petaluma, California:

Petaluma City Council in 2018 restricted placement of 5G and similar antennas to 500 feet from residences and 1,500 feet from the next tower.

Massachusetts:

Pennsylvania:

Switzerland:

UK:

Confusion over 5G and street lamps, and their health effects in Gateshead:

5G and mmW (millimeter Wave) and Terahertz radiation: Health Harm

  • Key recommendations:
    1)
    Do not proceed to roll out 5G technologies pending pre-market studies on health effects
    2)
    Re-evaluate safety standards based on long term as well as short term studies on biological effects
                 (Russell C, 2017)
  • Frequencies:

    The new ‘5G’ (5th generation wireless radiation system) will use high frequencies. The 5G frequencies will probably be in the ‘millimetre Wave’ (mmW) range of about 30-300 GHz (= 10–1 mm = 0.003-0.3 THz), and Terahertz (300-3,000 GHz = 0.3-3 THz, = 1.0-0.1 mm).

    These may include 28 GHz, and perhaps 38, 60 and 72-73 GHz. There is no agreed standard yet. Research began under NASA in 2008. The electronic weapon Active Denial uses 95 GHz (= 3 mm wavelength). At the lower end, these frequencies are not far from WiFi and other microwave uses like cellphones, including frequencies like WiFi’s 5 GHz.
  • Approval and Trials:

    Trials were held in cities in the Netherlands in 2015. Larger trials are scheduled for 2017 in 11 cities in the USA and in London, England. Some states are seeking to eliminate new ​5G ​small cell Distributed Antenna System​s​ (DAS) from local control and jurisdiction. These small cells will be fitted on electric and light poles in front of businesses and residences. There is growing anger and disbelief at the disregard for the massive health problems which GHz radiation will cause so close to homes.
  • Monica Alleven: “Ericsson wants STA for supersecret 5G tests before Verizon board meeting” (Fierce Wireless, January 27 2017)
  • Kate Cox: “FCC Chair On 5G Future: “You Ain’t Seen Nothin’ Yet.”” (Consumerist, July 9 2016)
  • Sean Kinney: “Verizon project in Palo Alto highlights challenges in scaling small cells” (RCR Wireless News, June 16 2017)

    The test results for 4G small cells in Palo Alto show that there is a major health crisis in the making. Critics argue that each small cell appears to be breaking the Nuremberg Code as regards its irradiation of passers by and local residents. Measurements show that RF/MW radiation is from 720,000 µW/m² to 1,230,000 µW/m². These levels are extremely hazardous according to Biological Safety Limits, where 1,000 µW/m² is an ‘extreme hazard’. The exposure is continuous for many persons and cumulative.
  • PMG: “Palo Alto 4G Small Cells: An Extreme Health Hazard” (Scientists for Wired Technology, April 23 2017)
  • No full health evaluation for 5G:

    There was a disastrous failure to evaluate fully the health harm from wireless radiation at lower frequencies than 5G, before the release of cellphones, cellphone towers, WiFi and smart meters. All this radiation, including 5G, is now classified as a class 2B human carcinogen and is a known neurological agent. The leading international experts now say that there is sufficient evidence to reclassify it as a class 2A probable or class 1 certain human carcinogen. There has so far been no full evaluation of the health harm from 5G radiation, especially long-term effects. This implies that 5G trials, often on mainly innocent and unaware populations, may be in contravention of the Nuremberg code.
  • 5G Health Harm: 5G radiation exposure should be below limits for sensitive populations:

    5G radiation is classified as a 2B human carcinogen which experts say should now be moved to a class 2A or 1 category (see above).

    Research since the 1970s and 1980s has shown that mmW is definitely bioactive. Exposure to mmW has both harmful and therapeutic effects, depending on frequencies, type of signals, exposure strength and exposure duration. It is also well established that many of these effects are non-thermal, although some are also the result of heating. The effects can also be non-linear and are sometimes genetically based, making detailed research essential before 5G radiation is approved for public or private irradiation areas where some members of the public will be especially sensitive depending on their genetic make-up. 

    Now that real electrosensitivity is a well recognised condition (e.g. Belpomme D et al, 2015), it would be appropriate to ensure that all 5G transmitters are compliant with biological limits, such as the EUROPAEM 2016 Guidelines. The latter provide the latest safety limits for people with electrosensitivity (Belyaev I et a, 2016). It has been accepted by the WHO since 2002 that lower biological limits are required for “certain sensitive individuals” (ICNIRP) who need limits below the current heating standards.
  • Established Health risks from 5G:

    Many non-thermal effects are established, but the safety limits do not apply to them or to people especially sensitive to this type of radiation. In addition there are heating effects. The current outdated limits  apply only to these heating limits.

    It seems that mmW has harmful effects similar to other non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation. These include: gene expression and cancer, DNA changes, antibiotic effects, effects on inter-cellular communication and acupuncture points, cognitive and fetal effects, effects on calcium mechanisms, effects on the eyes, and localized heating. There are also reports of specific EHS symptoms following mmW therapeutic exposure.

    Of particular concern are elderly people and others with thin skin. Exposure at mmW is known to penetrate the outer layers of skin. Where the skin is thinner or more vulnerable or sensitive, such as where there are more sweat ducts and pores, as on the face and back of hands, such people will be particularly vulnerable to the non-thermal effects as well as thermal ones. This already seems to be the case with the higher frequencies of WiFi.

    There is also special concern over the eyes, since mmW radiation is particularly harmful to the optical system. Prolonged exposure to 5G mmW radiation needs more ophthalmic research.
  • See below for a few of the hundreds of studies on health effects of mmW and Terahertz.
  • States should put public health before wireless convenience:

    Michigan Senator Patrick Colbeck:
    “Article 4 section 51 of the Michigan Constitution States: ‘the public health and the general welfare of the people of the state are hereby declared to be a matter of primary public concern. The legislature shall pass suitable laws for the protection and promotion of public health.’ Despite the convenience and the enormous economic growth potential associated with the Internet of Things our primary concern as legislators is not convenience, nor economic growth. As much as I love technology as per our Michigan constitution the public health and the general welfare of the people of our state are supposed to be our primary concern”. 

    “This convenience comes at a price and it comes at the price to the health of many of our citizens most notably children babies in the womb and even adults who suffer from hyper sensitivity to wireless transitions”. 

    “Many of us are rightly concerned about the hazards of cigarettes, lead levels..and other harmful substances…but I regret to inform you that we need to add electromagnetic radiation from wireless technology to this list”


         Senator Patrick Colbeck: “Colbeck cites health as reason to slow ‘small cell’ rush” (March 15 2018, 6 min.)

Impact of 5G health harm admitted:

“1.7. 5G Electromagnetic Radiation and Safety
Significant concern is emerging over the possible impact on health and safety arising from potentially much higher exposure to RF EM radiation arising from 5G. Increased exposure may result not only from the use of much higher frequencies in 5G but also from the potential for the aggregation of different signals, their dynamic nature, and the complex interference effects that may result, especially in dense urban areas.
The 5G radio emission fields are quite different to those of previous generations because of their complex beamformed transmissions in both directions – from base station to handset and for the return. Although fields are highly focused by beams, they vary rapidly with time and movement and so are unpredictable, as the signal levels and patterns interact as a closed loop system. This has yet to be mapped reliably for real situations, outside the laboratory.
While the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) issues guidelines for limiting exposure to electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (EMF), and EU member states are subject to Council Recommendation 1999/519/EC which follows ICNIRP guidelines, the problem is that currently it is not possible to accurately simulate or measure 5G emissions in the real world.”
[pp.11-12]
             Colin Blackman and Simon Forge: “5G Deployment State of Play in Europe, USA and Asia” (for the European Parliament’s Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, April 2019)

Articles:

Videos:

5G from Space:

Fiber optic cables as safe alternative to dangerous 5G radiation

Active Denial 95GHz offensive weapon, Directed Energy Weapons:

5G censorship:

5G Technical:

Merchandise:

A few Health Studies from hundreds:

​For evidence that microwave resonance effects depend on cell density, suggesting cell-to-cell interaction during response to exposure cells to mmW at 51.755 GHz for10 minutes, see slide 18 of:

Gene expression and cancer:

Alexandrov BS et al​, 2011Habauzit D et al​, 2014Korenstein-Ilan A et al, 2008.

DNA changes:

Alexandrov BS et al​, 2010 

Cellular apoptosis and proliferation, calcium dynamics:

Li X et al, 2010Wu G et al, 2011Li X et al, 2012; Li X et al, 2012Ye J et al, 2015

Antibiotic effects:

Soghomonyan D et al, 2016Torgomyan H et al, 2012.

Inter-cellular communication and acupuncture points, low intensity effects:

DeSmul A​, 1996Lysenyuk VP et al​, 2000Vorobyov VV et al​, 2002

Specific EHS symptoms, eg parethesia, fatigue and sleepiness:

Usichenko TI et al, 2006 

Cognitive and fetal effects:

Zhao Z et al, 1998; Zhao ZG et al, 2005

Behavioral, and histopathological changes:

Sharma A et al, 2017

Calcium mechanism:

Titushkin IA et al​, 2009 
DNA damage:

Greschner AA et al. 2019

Eyes effect:

Gandhi OP et al, 1986

Skin effects, hydration:

Alekseev SI et al, 2008 

Skin effects, sweat ducts:

Feldman Y et al, 2008Feldman Y et al, 2009; Ney M et al, 2011Tripathi SR et al, 2015; Betzalel N et al, 2017; copyBetzalel N et al, 2018

Localized heating:

Millenbaugh NJ et al, 2008Romanenko S et al​, 2014; Wu T et al, 2015Neufeld E et al, 2018; Neufeld E et al, 2019

Review:
Pakhomov AG et al, 1998; article; Wu T et al, 2015

Kositsky NN et al.: “Influence of High-frequency Electromagnetic Radiation at Non-thermal Intensities on the Human Body: A review of work by Russian and Ukrainian researchers” (No Place To Hide, Newsletter of the Cellular Phone Taskforce Inc. (Trans. P Ormsby), 2001)

Zalyubovskaya NP: “Biological Effects of Millimetre Waves” (1977, declassified 2012)

Collections of studies:

High Power Levels needed for 5G Devices:

Colombi D et al, 2015; Thors B et al, 2016

Non-thermal effects of 5G-type radiation:

Some 5G proponents pretend that 5G has only thermal effects.

In fact, many non-thermal effects have been documented.

Some bioeffects of 5G-type radiation on wildlife:​

Difficulties in 5G meeting International Safety Guidellines:

There are reports that 5G may require radiation at too high levels to meet International Safety Guidelines, such as:

See:

5G Handset Antenna do not meet Heating Limits: User’s Exposure to be Blocked

  • “If the user’s tissue is close to a given module, the mm-wave path for that module will be blocked and the modem will select a different module and/or beam to avoid the user’s blocking effect. In this way, in practice, it is unlikely that the user would be exposed to long-duration full-power transmission …
    capacitive and proximity sensors are used to disable transmission from a given mm-wave antenna array module when a user may be located in close proximity to the module and in a direction in the module may transmit …
    for each module’s testing, portions of the measurement planes around the device are excluded from measurement, since the proximity detection system would prevent transmission if the user occupied those regions …
    for each of the principal plane directions, the PD is measured at a conservative distance of 70 mm where the proximity sensor may stop detecting the presence of user.”
        
    4.2.3 Beamforming; 4.2.4 Proximity Detection Scheme and Excluded Regions 
        (T56XL1: Mobile 5G MOD RF Exposure Info Power Density Simulation report_0213 Motorola Mobility LLC:          Power Density Simulation and Measurement Report, December 2018, Rev. 1.2)

Government strategies for 5G

These mainly omit the vital issue of health dangers of irradiating populations with an established 2B human carcinogen. They do not explain who will pay for negative health impacts or how governments will rectify the established damage to wildlife.

Australia:

Canada:

European Union:

India:

New Zealand:

South Afrrica:

UK:

USA:

5G Security Risks

5G in rural areas

5G energy consumption, number of celltowers and increased costs

Fake News and Conspiracy Theory Propaganda

It has been proven many times that radio frequency radiation causes cancer, a fact known since 1953, and that RF radiation causes electrosensitivity, a fact known since 1932. As the propaganda for the wireless industry has become more desperate, now that the World Health Organization has classified it as a 2B human carcinogen, it has resorted to creating fake news and several conspiracy theories.

Propagandists for the wireless industry refuse to accept the majority scientific viewpoint which, since 1958 in the USSR and eastern countries and 2008 in western countries, has accepted non-thermal adverse effects from RF EMFs. One conspiracy theory (William Broad, May 12 2019) blamed RT America News for starting the reporting of adverse effects. This conspiracy theory ignored the tens of thousands of published studies proving non-thermal effects over the last six decades, long before RT America was in existence, it is clearly absurd to blame RT America for creating them long after the event. Another conspiracy theory (Sabrina Weiss, June 12 2019) blamed John Kuhles of the Danish Stop 5G Facebook Group, as though people in the US and England act only on what they read on a Danish Facebook page. Jeffrey Cole, director of The Center for the Digital Future at USC Annenberg and thus part of the wireless industry, appeared to fall totally for the original industry conspiracy theory and even drew an analogy with Andrew Wakefield in England over vaccinations, claiming that the science-based campaign against 5G “endangers lives”. The CTIA also believes in the conspiracy theory, claiming the Russian government is “spreading false information about 5G and health”.

One person referred to was Marvin Ziskin, a co-chair of the IEEE Committee SC-4, a minority-viewpoint organisation linked with the wireless industry which often dismisses evidence of established health outcomes like cancer and electrosensitivity. Others holding a similar minority viewpoint included Aslak Harbo Poulsen of the Danish Cancer Society, Christoffer Johansen, formerly of the Danish Cancer Society, and David Robert Grimes and Dorothy V. M. Bishop from England. None of them appeared to be experts on real electrosensitivity or suffer it themselves.

By far the majority of involved scientists now accept non-thermal affects of RF EMFs, as do the military and numerous therapeutic medical procedures.

Fake news and conspiracy theory beliefs:

Exposure of the crude wireless industry conspiracy theories:

The majority and scientific viewpoint, based on established scientific evidence: